4.8 Article

Hybrid photocatalysis/membrane treatment for surface waters containing low concentrations of natural organic matters

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 323-330

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.011

Keywords

TiO2/UV photocatalysis; natural organic matter; membrane; adsorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the mid-1990s, numerous studies on the treatment of drinking water by photocatalysis have been reported. Once optimised, the photocatalytic process can completely degrade numerous natural and artificial organic compounds. in this study, a hybrid photocatalysis/membrane process was used as a polishing treatment of surface water containing a small concentration of natural organic matters (i.e. total organic carbon (TOC) concentration of around 3 mg/L) which may be difficult to remove using conventional filtration or coagulation. An optimum pH of 4.5 and a TiO2 concentration of 0.1 g/L were found to lead to the highest removal efficiencies. The relative effect of the individual processes featuring in the hybrid system (UV radiation, TiO2 adsorption and membrane filtration) was also assessed for different pH values. The membrane separation process was accounted to remove around 18% of the initial TOC concentration, while TiO2 adsorption alone was generally responsible for less than 5% of TOC removal during the 120 min of the experiments. However, when the natural water was only radiated by UV light, up to 70% of TOC was removed. A synergetic effect was observed when the three processes (TiO2, UV and membrane) were used together. Comparison of removal efficiencies obtained during real and model (international Humic Substance Society) waters treatment by photocatalysis is also presented, revealing the importance of the nature of the feed in this type of treatment. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available