4.5 Article

Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 136-146

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20741

Keywords

DT-MRI; tractography; tensor; invariant; anisotropy

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [T32CA009695] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [T32EB002177] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [T32-CA09695] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32-EB002177] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper outlines the mathematical development and application of two analytically orthogonal tensor invariants sets. Diffusion tensors can be mathematically decomposed into shape and orientation information, determined by the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, respectively. The developments herein orthogonally decompose the tensor shape using a set of three orthogonal invariants that characterize the magnitude of isotropy, the magnitude of anisotropy, and the mode of anisotropy. The mode of anisotropy is useful for resolving whether a region of anisotropy is linear anisotropic, orthotropic, or planar anisotropic. Both tensor trace and fractional anisotropy are members of an orthogonal invariant set, but they do not belong to the same set. It is proven that tensor trace and fractional anisotropy are not mutually orthogonal measures of the diffusive process. The results are applied to the analysis and visualization of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images of the brain in a healthy volunteer. The theoretical developments provide a method for generating scalar maps of the diffusion tensor data, including novel fractional anisotropy maps that are color encoded for the mode of anisotropy and directionally encoded colormaps of only linearly anisotropic structures, rather than of high fractional anisotropy structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available