4.5 Article

Age-related changes in the biomechanics of healing patellar tendon

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 2205-2212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.003

Keywords

age-related (aging); biomechanics; repair; tendon; rabbit; functional

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [46574] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By 2030, there will be 70 million people in the United States over the age of 65, and by 2050, 22% of the US population will be considered elderly. It is generally believed that injuries in the elderly heal slower and less completely than in adolescents or young adults. To evaluate aging effects on tissue repair a surgical injury was created in the middle third of one patellar tendon in 1- and 4-5-year-old New Zealand White rabbits. The biomechanical properties of the isolated repair tissues and contralateral normal tendon tissues were compared at 6, 12 and 26 weeks post-injury. We hypothesized that repair tissues would exhibit age-related reductions in biomechanical properties at all time intervals of healing, both based on raw data and when normalized to values from contralateral tendons. Repairs from both age groups were similar, with no significant increase in maximum stress, strain at maximum stress, or modulus between 6 and 12 weeks. At 26 weeks, the repairs in the 4-year-old rabbits had higher maximum stress values than repairs in the 1-year-old rabbits (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the strain at maximum stress or modulus. When repair tissue properties were normalized to values in the contralateral normal tendon, the maximum stress of the patellar tendon repair tissue from the 4 year old was significantly greater than the corresponding value from the I year old at the 26 week time point (p = 0.04). In conclusion, these findings do not support the presence of age-related declines in the biomechanics of healing tendon. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available