4.8 Article

Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase in Cancer Cells Slows Down Replication Forks, Activates Dormant Origins, and Induces DNA Damage

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 11, Pages 4470-4480

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3028

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH [Z01 BC 006150-19LMP, 1Z01BC010411-09]
  2. University College London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein acetylation is a reversible process regulated by histone deacetylases (HDAC) that is often altered in human cancers. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) is the first HDAC inhibitor to be approved for clinical use as an anticancer agent. Given that histone acetylation is a key determinant of chromatin structure, we investigated how SAHA may affect DNA replication and integrity to gain deeper insights into the basis for its anticancer activity. Nuclear replication factories were visualized with confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and single-replicon analyses were conducted by genome-wide molecular combing after pulse labeling with two thymidine analogues. We found that pharmacologic concentrations of SAHA induce replication-mediated DNA damage with activation of histone gamma H2AX. Single DNA molecule analyses indicated slowdown in replication speed along with activation of dormant replication origins in response to SAHA. Similar results were obtained using siRNA-mediated depletion of HDAC3 expression, implicating this HDAC member as a likely target in the SAHA response. Activation of dormant origins was confirmed by molecular analyses of the beta-globin locus control region. Our findings demonstrate that SAHA produces profound alterations in DNA replication that cause DNA damage, establishing a critical link between robust chromatin acetylation and DNA replication in human cancer cells. Cancer Res; 70(11); 4470-80. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available