4.8 Article

Characterization and isolation of stem cell-enriched human hair follicle bulge cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 249-260

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI26043

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC005254, ZIASC003669, Z01BC005254, Z01SC003669, ZIABC010542, Z01BC010542] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human hair follicle bulge is an important niche for keratinocyte stem cells (KSCs). Elucidation of human bulge cell biology could be facilitated by analysis of global gene expression profiles and identification of unique cell-surface markers. The lack of distinctive bulge morphology in human hair follicles has hampered studies of bulge cells and KSCs. In this study, we determined the distribution of label-retaining cells to define the human anagen bulge. Using navigated laser capture microdissection, bulge cells and outer root sheath cells from other follicle regions were obtained and analyzed with cDNA microarrays. Gene transcripts encoding inhibitors of WNT and activin/bone morphogenic protein signaling were overrepresented in the bulge, while genes responsible for cell proliferation were underrepresented, consistent with the existence of quiescent noncycling KSCs in anagen follicles. Positive markers for bulge cells included CD200, PHLDA1, follistatin, and frizzled homolog 1, while CD24, CD34, CD71, and CD146 were preferentially expressed by nonbulge keratinocytes. Importantly, CD200(+) cells (CD200(hi)CD24(lo)CD34(lo)CD71(lo)CD146(lo)) obtained from hair follicle suspensions demonstrated high colony-forming efficiency in clonogenic assays, indicating successful enrichment of living human bulge stem cells. The stem cell behavior of enriched bulge cells and their utility for gene therapy and hair regeneration will need to be assessed in in vivo assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available