4.5 Article

Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 39, Issue 16, Pages 3010-3016

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.021

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm; biomechanics; failure strength; wall thickness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties in human abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was explored. Three unruptured and one ruptured AAA were harvested as a whole during necropsy. Thickness was measured at about every 1.5 cm(2) wall surface area for an average of 100 measurement sites per AAA. Multiple longitudinally oriented rectangular specimen strips were cut at various locations from each AAA for a total of 48 strips. The strips were subjected to uniaxial extension until failure. Wall thickness varied regionally and between AAA from as low as 0.23 mm at a rupture site to 4.26 mm at a calcified site (median=1.48 mm). Wall thickness was slightly lower in the posterior and right regions. The failure tension (ultimate) of specimen strips varied regionally and between AAA from 5.5 N/cm close to a blister site in the ruptured AAA to 42.3 N/cm at the undilated neck of a 4cm diameter unruptured AAA (median=14.8 N/cm). Failure stress (ultimate) varied from 33.6 to 235.1 N/cm(2) (median=126.6 N/cm(2)). There was no perceptible pattern in failure properties along the circumference. Failure tension of specimen strips at or close to blisters was mostly low. The rupture site in the ruptured aneurysm had the lowest recorded wall thickness of 0.23 turn, with only slightly higher readings within a 1 cm radius. The failure tension of the specimen strip close to the rupture site was low (11.1 N/cm) compared to its neighborhood in the ruptured aneurysm. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available