4.5 Article

Biomechanics of single zonal chondrocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages 1595-1602

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.002

Keywords

articular cartilage; cytocompression; Poisson's ratio; single cell mechanics; viscoelasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Articular cartilage has a distinct zonal architecture, and previous work has shown that chondrocytes from different zones exhibit variations in gene expression and biosynthesis. In this study, the material properties of single chondrocytes from the superficial and middle/deep zones of bovine distal metatarsal articular cartilage were determined using unconfined compression and digital videocapture. To determine the viscoelastic properties of zonal chondrocytes, unconfined creep compression experiments were performed and the resulting creep curves of individual cells were fit using a standard linear viscoelastic solid model. In the model, a fixed value of the Poisson's ratio was used, determined optically from direct compression of middle/deep chondrocytes. The two approaches used in this study yielded the following average material properties of single chondrocytes: Poisson's ratio of 0.26 +/- 0.08, instantaneous modulus of 1.06 +/- 0.82kPa, relaxed modulus of 0.78 +/- 0.58kPa, and apparent viscosity of 4.08 +/- 7.2OkPas. Superficial zone chondrocytes were found to be significantly stiffer than middle/deep zone chondrocytes. Attachment time did not affect the stiffness of the cells. The zonal variation in viscoelastic properties may result from the distinct mechanical environments experienced by the cells in vivo. Identifying intrinsic differences in the biomechanics of superficial and middle/deep zone chondrocytes is an important component in understanding how biomechanics influence articular cartilage health and disease. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available