4.8 Article

Strong Smooth Muscle Differentiation Is Dependent on Myocardin Gene Amplification in Most Human Retroperitoneal Leiomyosarcomas

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 2269-2278

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1443

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de In Recherche Medicale, Institut Curie, INCa [PL007]
  2. Ligue Nationale Centre le Cancer
  3. Ministere de I'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  4. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  5. Paris-Descartes University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myocardin (MYOCD), a serum response factor (SRF) transcriptional cofactor, is essential for cardiac and smooth muscle development and differentiation. We show here by array-based comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and expression analysis approaches that MYOCD gene is highly amplified and overexpressed in human retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas (LMS), a very aggressive well-differentiated tumor. MYOCD inactivation by shRNA in a human LMS cell line with MYOCD locus amplification leads to a dramatic decrease of smooth muscle differentiation and strongly reduces cell migration. Moreover, forced MYOCD expression in three undifferentiated sarcoma cell lines. and in one liposarcoma cell line confers a strong smooth muscle differentiation phenotype and increased migration abilities. Collectively, these results show that human retroperitoneal LMS differentiation is dependent on MYOCD amplification/overexpression, suggesting that in these well-differentiated LMS, differentiation could be a consequence of an acquired genomic alteration. In this hypothesis, these tumors would not necessarily derive from cells initially committed to smooth muscle differentiation. These data also provide new insights on the cellular origin of these sarcomas and on the complex connections between oncogenesis and differentiation in mesenchymal tumors. [Cancer Res 2009;69(6):2269-78]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available