4.5 Article

Three-point bending and acoustic emission study of adult rat femora after immobilization and free remobilization

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 237-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.040

Keywords

acoustic emission; cortical bone; immobilization; mechanical properties; remobilization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experiment concerned effects of immobilization and remobilization on mechanical properties of femoral shaft. Twenty-four weeks old male rats were used: two groups (I3 and I3R4) with the right hindlimb immobilized for 3 weeks by taping, and one control (C). In I3R4 immobilization was followed by 4 weeks of free remobilization. Mechanical properties in three-point bending, mass, geometry, and mineralization of bone tissue were measured post mortem in both femora in I3 and I3R4 and in right femora in control. Acoustic emission signals (AE) were recorded during the bending test. The right femora in I3, I3R4 and C did not differ significantly in size, mass and mineralization (ANOVA). The differences were significant considering mechanical parameters and AE signals. In I3 yield bending moment and stiffness were lower (p = 0.013 and 0.025) and deflection was larger (p = 0.030) than in C. In I3R4 maximum bending moment, yield moment, stiffness and work to failure were lower than in C (p = 0.013, 0.009, 0.032, and 0.005). Paired t-test showed that remobilization resulted in worsening of properties of right femora. Side-to-side differences in I3R4 were more pronounced than in I3. Moreover, AE signals from the right femora were more numerous and burst type than from the left. The results demonstrate that strength of bone decreases during the first period of free remobilization. The decrease is accompanied by a significant decrease of bone toughness. The AE data support the hypothesis that immobilization-related degradation of bone mechanical properties is associated with increasing brittleness of cortical bone tissue. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available