4.6 Article

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 60-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.058

Keywords

pulmonary embolism; deep venous thrombosis; venous thromboembolism; cancer; neoplasm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: There are sparse data on the frequency of venous thromboembolism in patients with various types of cancer. We sought to determine the incidence and relative risk of venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis in patients with malignancies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The number of patients discharged with a diagnostic code for 19 types of malignancies, pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis from 1979 through 1999 was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Patients studied were men and women of all ages and races. RESULTS: In patients with any of the 19 malignancies studied, 827 000 of 40 787 000 (2.0%) had venous thromboembolism, which was twice the incidence in patients without these malignancies, 6 854 000 of 662 309 000 (1.0%). The highest incidence of venous thromboembolism was in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas, 51 000 of 1 176 000 (4.3%), and the lowest incidences were in patients with carcinoma of the bladder and carcinoma of the lip, oral cavity or pharynx. The overall incidences of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis were also twice the rates in noncancer patients. Incidences with cancer were not age dependent. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer began to increase in the late 1980s. CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer had twice the incidence of venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis as patients without cancer. The incidence of venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis associated with cancer differed according to the type of cancer, was comparable in elderly and younger patients, and increased in the late 1980s and 1990s. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available