4.8 Article

Protein Kinase Cδ Activates RelA/p65 and Nuclear Factor-κB Signaling in Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 14, Pages 5927-5935

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4786

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan
  2. Sumitomo Foundation
  3. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  4. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  5. Life Science Foundation of Japan
  6. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  7. Cell Science Research Foundation
  8. Senri Life Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) is tightly modulated by I kappa B kinases and I kappa B alpha in the cytoplasm. On stimulation, NF-kappa B translocates into the nucleus to initiate transcription; however, regulation of its transcriptional activity remains obscure. Here, we show that protein kinase C (PKC) delta controls the main subunit of NF-kappa B, RelA/p65. On exposure to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), the expression of RelA/p65 target genes such as I kappa B alpha, RelB, and p100/p52 is upregulated in a PKC delta-dependent manner. The results also show that PKC delta is targeted to the nucleus and forms a complex with RelA/p65 following TNF-alpha exposure. Importantly, kinase activity of PKC delta is required for RelA/p65 transactivation. In concert with these results, PKC delta activates RelA/p65 for its occupancy to target-gene promoters, including I kappa B alpha and p100/p52. Moreover, functional analyses show that inhibition of PKC delta is associated with substantial attenuation of NF-kappa B activity in response to TNF-alpha. These findings provide evidence that PKC delta orchestrates RelA/p65 transactivation, a requisite for NF-kappa B signaling pathway in the nucleus. [Cancer Res 2009;69(14):5927-35]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available