4.8 Article

Deciphering the Impact of Common Genetic Variation on Lung Cancer Risk: A Genome-Wide Association Study

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 16, Pages 6633-6641

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0680

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C1298/A8780, C1298/A8362]
  2. Allan J Lerner Fund
  3. National Cancer Research Network Helen Rollason Heal Cancer Charity and Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Sanofi-Aventis
  5. NIH [SR01CA055769, 5R01CA127219, 5R01CAI33996, 5R01CA121197]
  6. NHS
  7. MRC [G0000934] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0000934] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To explore the impact of common variation on the risk of developing lung cancer, we conducted a two-phase genome-wide association (GWA) study. In phase 1, we compared the genotypes of 511,919 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 1,952 cases and 1,438 controls; in phase 2, 30,568 SNPs were genotyped in 2,465 cases and 3,005 controls. SNP selection was based on best supported P values from pase 1 and two other GWA studies of lung cancer. In the combined analysis of phases 1 and 2, the strongest associations identified were defined by SNPs mapping to 15q25.1 (rs12914385; P = 3.19 x 10(-16)), 5p15.33 (rA975616; p = 6.66 x 10(-7)), and 6p21.33 (rs3117582; P = 9.13 x 10(-7)). Variation at 15q25.1, but not 5p15.33 or 6p21.33, was strongly associated with smoking behavior with risk alleles correlated to higher consumption. Variation at 5p15.33 was shown to significantly influence induction of lung cancer histology. Pooling data from the four series provided 21,620 genotypes for 7,560 cases and 8,205 controls. A meta-analysis provided increased support that variation at 15q25.1 (rs8034191; P = 3.24 x 10(-26)), 5p15.33 (rs4975616; P = 2.99 x 10(-9)), and 6p21.33 (rs3117582, P = 4.46 x 10(-10)) influences lung cancer risk. The next best-supported associations were attained at 15q15.2 (rs748404: P = 1.08 x 10(-6)) and 10q23.31 (rs1926203; P = 1.28 x 10(-6) These data indicate few common variants account for 1% of the excess familial risk underscoring the necessity of having additional large sample series for gene discovery. [Cancer Res 2009;69(16):6633-41]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available