4.6 Article

GW274150, a novel and highly selective inhibitor of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), shows analgesic effects in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain

Journal

PAIN
Volume 120, Issue 1-2, Pages 170-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.028

Keywords

nitric oxide; hyperalgesia; chronic inflammation; neuropathic pain; iNOS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO), synthesised by different isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), has been linked with the development and maintenance of nociception. We studied the role of the inducible isoform, iNOS, in two different rat pain models with an inflammatory component. iNOS was immunohistochemically detected locally in the paw 6 h after Freund's Complete Adjuvant (FCA) injection, showing a plateau at 24-72 h and falling slowly in the following weeks. This correlated with the late phase of the hypersensitivity to pain revealed in the behavioural tests. A highly selective iNOS inhibitor GW274150 (1-30 mg/kg orally, 24 h after FCA) suppressed the accumulation of nitrite in the inflamed paw indicating substantial iNOS inhibition. At the same time it partially reversed FCA-induced hypersensitivity to pain and edema in a dose-dependent manner. After Chronic Constriction Injury (CCI) surgery to the sciatic nerve, iNOS presence was only detected locally in the region of the nerve (inflammatory cells). GW274150 (3-30 mg/kg orally, 21 days after surgery) also reversed significantly the CCI-associated hypersensitivity to pain. No iNOS was detectable in dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord or brain in either model. This study demonstrates a role for peripherally-expressed iNOS in pain conditions with an inflammatory component and the potential value of iNOS inhibitors in such conditions. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available