4.5 Article

Primary human hepatocytes in spheroid formation to study hepatitis C infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 52-57

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.04.043

Keywords

CD81; human scavenger receptor B1; models; quasispecies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Hepatitis C (HCV) is a worldwide health problem, affecting nearly 170 million people. Current models for studying Hepatitis C have focused primarily on the use of poorly permissive cell lines and viral constructs, because of the lack of a suitable animal model or an in vitro system for studying functional infection. As hepatocytes are the primary reservoir for the virus in vivo, we report on a model using primary human hepatocytes cultured in spheroid formation. Materials and methods. The hepatocytes were harvested from uninfected liver resections and cultured as spheroids (that promotes a differentiated phenotype) or monolayers. Spheroids expressed the putative receptors CD81 and human scavenger receptor 131 in a variable pattern throughout the culture period. Samples were inoculated with infectious HCV serum, and HCV RNA was detected using RT-PCR. RNA was detected in the cells and culture medium by 3 days and 5 days after inoculation, respectively. Selection of HVR1 variants occurred in a differential pattern based on culture technique, suggesting that viral selection was dependent on host phenotype. Detection of NS5A by Western blot analysis of infected samples and immunofluorescence for HCV core protein was seen only in infected spheroids. Conclusion. The use of spheroid formation to study Hepatitis C is associated with the establishment of HVR1 selection and functional infection. This represents a promising alternative model to study Hepatitis C. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available