4.6 Article

Altered response to rTMS in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 103-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.09.016

Keywords

transcranial stimulation; repetitive magnetic stimulation; MEP; cortical excitability; synaptic efficacy; Alzheimer's disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In this study, we tested the excitability of cortical motor areas in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Because repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates cortical excitability, possibly by inducing a short-term increase in synaptic efficacy, we used rTMS to investigate motor cortex excitability in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Methods: We tested the changes in the size and threshold of motor evoked potential (MEP) and cortical silent period (CSP) duration evoked by focal rTMS delivered in 10 trains of 10 stimuli at 5 Hz frequency and 120% rMth intensity in a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease, and age-matched controls. In a further session, rTMS was also delivered at I Hz frequency (trains of 10 stimuli, 120% rMth). Results: Whereas in control Subjects, 5 Hz-rTMS elicited normal MEPs that progressively increased in size during the train, in patients, it elicited MEPs that decreased in size. The increase in the duration of the CSP was similar in patients and healthy controls. One hertz rTMS left the MEP amplitude unchanged in patients and healthy controls. Conclusions: The lack of MEP facilitation reflects an altered response to 5 Hz-rTMS in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Significance: Our rTNIS findings strongly suggest an altered cortical plasticity in excitatory circuits within motor cortex in patients with Alzheimer's disease. (c) 2005 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available