4.5 Article

Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 2430-2436

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.009

Keywords

body image; body schema; perception; action

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence from neuropsychological patients suggests that multiple body representations exist. The most common dissociation is between body schema to guide limb movements, and body image used to make perceptual judgements. In the current study we employed a kinaesthetic illusion in two experiments to dissociate body representations in healthy individuals. Tendon vibration creates an illusory lengthening of the muscle and an illusive displacement of the limb. In Experiment I two conditions were used. In the 'direct' condition the biceps of the dominant right arm of blindfolded participants was vibrated, creating illusory elbow extension. In the 'indirect' condition the right knee was held with the vibrated right arm, creating illusive lowering of the leg and knee. In both conditions, subjects performed with the non-vibrated arm a reaching as well as a matching response, theorized to be based on the body schema and body image, respectively. Results showed that the illusion was significantly larger for the matching as compared to the reaching response, with the most pronounced difference observed in the direct condition. In Experiment 2 reaching and matching without vibration and a passive matching response were implemented in the direct condition. The same differential effect of the illusion was found. Results further showed that passive and active matching were statistically similar but significantly different from the reaching response. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the effect of the kinaesthetic illusion on reaching and matching differed, consistent with the idea of separate underlying body representations for both responses. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available