4.3 Article

Prevalence of vitamin K deficiency in children with mild to moderate chronic liver disease

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000189327.47150.58

Keywords

vitamin K; cholestatic liver disease; noncholestatic liver disease; PIVKA-II; children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Children with chronic liver disease are at risk for vitamin K deficiency because of fat malabsorption and inadequate dietary intake. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of vitamin K deficiency in children with mild to moderate chronic cholestatic and noncholestatic liver disease. Methods: Vitamin K status was examined in 43 children (0.25-15.9 years) with mild to moderate chronic cholestatic liver disease, 29 children (0.9-16.9 years) with chronic mild to moderate noncholestatic liver disease, and in 44 healthy children (1-18 years). Vitamin K status was assessed by the plasma PIVKA-II (protein induced in vitamin K absence) assay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Plasma PIVKA-II values greater than 3 ng/mL are indicative of vitamin K deficiency. Results: The mean plasma PIVKA-II (+/- SD) in cholestatic, noncholestatic, and healthy children was 61.9 +/- 144, 1.2 +/- 3, and 2.1 +/- ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.002). Fifty-four percent of the children supplemented with vitamin K had plasma PIVKA-II greater than 3 ng/mL. Plasma conjugated bilirubin, total bile acids, and severity of liver disease were positively correlated with plasma PIVKA-II levels (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Vitamin K deficiency is prevalent in children with mild to moderate chronic cholestatic liver disease, even with vitamin K supplementation. Elevated PIVKA-II levels occurred in children with a normal prothrombin, indicating that more sensitive markers of vitamin K status should be used in children with chronic liver disease. Vitamin K deficiency was related to degree of cholestasis and severity of liver disease in children. Children without cholestasis did not exhibit vitamin K deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available