4.5 Review

Contrast-enhanced versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate cancer detection: An overview of techniques and a systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 310-316

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.027

Keywords

prostate, neoplasms; prostate neoplasms, diagnosis; prostate neoplasms, staging; ultrasonography; contrast media; biopsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An overview is given of the current conventional and contrast-specific transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) techniques for prostate imaging that may be used for guiding biopsy. Subsequently, a systematic literature search resulted in inclusion of four studies that directly compared systematic and contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate. All four studies revealed that contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy significantly improved the positive biopsy core rate. In the largest study, the mean Gleason score of the contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUSC-guided biopsies was significantly higher than that of the systematic biopsies. Future randomized clinical trials, preferably in a non-academic multi-institutional set-up, will have to be per-formed to confirm the value of con trast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy in regular clinical practice. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available