4.6 Review

Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: a systematic review

Journal

INFECTION
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 51-58

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-007-6142-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-neoformans cryptococci have been generally regarded as saprophytes and rarely reported as human pathogens. However, the incidence of infection due to these organisms has increased over the past 40 years, with Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus, together, responsible for 80% of reported cases. Conditions associated with impaired cell-mediated immunity are important risks for non-neoformans cryptococcal infections and prior azole prophylaxis has been associated with antifungal resistance. The presence of invasive devices was a significant risk factor for Cryptococcus laurentii infection (adjusted OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 1.48-82.9; p = 0.003), while predictors for mortality included age >= 45 years (aOR = 8.4; 95% CI = 1.18-78.82; p = 0.004) and meningeal presentation (aOR = 7.0; 95% CI = 1.85-60.5; p= 0.04). Because clinical manifestations of non-neoformans cryptococcal infections are most often indistinguishable from Cryptococcus neoformans, a high index of suspicion remains important to facilitate early diagnosis and prompt treatment for such infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available