4.6 Review

Gastric stump carcinoma - Epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment

Journal

EJSO
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 133-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.006

Keywords

gastric stump; remnant stomach; lymphadenectomy; partial gastrectomy; distal gastric resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The aim of this article is to review the aetiology, pathology and treatment of gastric stump carcinoma (GSC). GSC is an uncommon tumour, however. the incidence is not declining, so this tumour entity will be encountered in the years to come. Methods: The electronic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE database to identify relevant studies concerning epidemiology, prognosis, treatment, aetiology and pathology of GSC. The references reported in these studies were used to complete the literature search. Results: Patients subjected to distal gastric resection have a 4-7-fold increased risk of developing GSC, which is attributed mainly to gastroduodenal reflux. Denervation during partial gastrectomy may also contribute to the risk of developing GSC. Gastroduodenal ulcers were the main reason for partial gastrectomy. Both ulcer locations have an increased risk of developing GSC after 20 years. In GSC, Helicobacter pylori seems not to be an important risk factor, contrary to primary gastric cancer, because gastroduodenal reflux impairs the growth of Helicobacter pylori. Conclusion: The treatment of choice for GSC should be the total removal of the gastric remnant including at least D2 lymphadenectomy. The pattern of lymph node metastases in GSC may differ from primary gastric cancer, as lymph node metastases have been reported in the jejunal mesentery and the lower mediastinum. Therefore, GSC may require a modified lymphadenectomy to include all important lymph node stations. After radical remnant gastrectomy, GSC has a prognosis not different from primary proximal gastric cancer. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available