4.8 Article

Overexpression of the Cellular DEK Protein Promotes Epithelial Transformation In vitro and In vivo

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 1792-1799

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2304

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA59268, T32 CA059268, R01 CA102357-01A1, R01 CA116316-01A1, CA114004, R01 CA116316, R01 CA114004, R01 CA102357, CA116316] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL079193, R01 HL079193] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High levels of expression of the human DEK gene have been correlated with numerous human malignancies. Intracellular DEK functions have been described in vitro and include DNA supercoiling, DNA replication, RNA splicing, and transcription. We have shown that DEK also suppresses cellular senescence, apoptosis, and differentiation, thus promoting cell growth and survival in monolayer and organotypic epithelial raft models. Such functions are likely to contribute to cancer, but direct evidence to implicate DEK as an oncogene has remained elusive. Here, we show that in line with an early role in tumorigenesis, murine papilloma formation in a classical chemical carcinogenesis model was reduced in DEK knockout mice. Additionally, human papillomavirus E6/E7, hRas, and DEK cooperated in the transformation of keratinocytes in soft agar and xenograft establishment, thus also implicating DEK in tumor promotion at later stages. Finally, adenoviral DEK depletion via short hairpin RNA expression resulted in cell death in human tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, but did not significantly affect differentiated epithelial cells. Taken together, our data uncover oncogenic DEK activities as postulated from its frequent up-regulation in human malignancies, and suggest that the targeted suppression of DEK may become a strategic approach to the treatment of cancer. [Cancer Res 2009;69(5):1792-9]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available