4.5 Article

Cell-specific differential modulation of human trabecular meshwork cells by selective adenosine receptor agonists

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 126-134

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.09.007

Keywords

intraocular pressure; aqueous humor outflow; ion transport; cell volume regulation

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY001583, R01EY013624] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NEI NIH HHS [P30 EY001583, R01 EY013624, EY013624, EY01583] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of A(1) and A(2A) subtype adenosine receptors (AR) likely exert opposing effects on outflow of aqueous humor, and thereby, on intraocular pressure. Selective agonists of adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes have previously been applied to trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal (SC) cells to identify the site(s) of differential purinergic modulation. However, the apparent changes in volume monitored by previously measuring projected cell area might have partially reflected cell contraction and relaxation. In addition, whole-cell current responses of the TM cells previously described were highly variable following application of selective A(1), A(2A) and A(3) agonists. The complexity of the electrophysiologic responses may have reflected cell heterogeneity of the populations harvested from collagenase digestion of TM explants. We now report measurements of TM-cell volume using calcein fluorescence quenching, an approach independent of contractile state. Furthermore, we have applied selective AR agonists to a uniform population of human TM cells, the hTM5 cell line. A(1), but not A(2A) or A(3), AR agonists triggered TM-cell shrinkage. Both A(1) and A(2A) AR agonists produced reproducible increases in TM-cell whole-cell currents of similar magnitude. The results suggest that previous measurements of explant-derived TM cells may have reflected a range of responses from phenotypically different cell populations, and that the opposing effects of A(1) and A(2A) agonists on outflow resistance are not likely to be mediated by actions on a single population of TM cells. These opposing effects might reflect AR responses by two or more subpopulations of TM cells, by TM and SC cells or by inner-wall SC cells, alone. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available