4.8 Article

Genetic Instability Caused by Loss of MutS Homologue 3 in Human Colorectal Cancer

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 20, Pages 8465-8472

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [1Z01ES023016-05, R01 CA72851]
  2. Association for International Cancer Research [03-103]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16591358]
  4. Baylor University Medical Center
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16591358] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. High levels of MSI at mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats in colorectal cancer (CRC) are attributed to inactivation of the MMR genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2. CRC with low levels of MSI (NISI-L) exists; however, its molecular basis is unclear. There is another type of MSI-elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EXAST)-where loci containing [AAAG](n) or [ATAG](n) repeats are unstable. EMAST is frequent in non-CRCs; however, the incidence of EMAST and its cause in CRC is not known. Here, we report that MutS homologue 3 (MSH3) knockdown or MSH3-deficient cells exhibit the EMAST phenotype and low levels of mutations at dinucleotide repeats. About 60% of 117 sporadic CRC cases exhibit EMAST. All of the cases defined as MSI-H (16 cases) exhibited high levels of EMAST. Among 101 non-MSI-H cases, all 19 cases of MSI-L and 35 of 82 cases of MSS exhibited EMAST. Although non-MSI-H CRC tissues contained MSH3-negative tumor cells ranging from 2% to 50% of the total tumor cell population, the tissues exhibiting EXAST contained more MSH3-negative cells (average, 31.5%) than did the tissues not exhibiting EMAST (8.4%). Taken together, our results support the concept that MSH3 deficiency causes EMAST or EMAST with low levels of MSI at loci with dinucleotide repeats in CRC. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8465-721

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available