4.4 Article

Wavelet-based characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from magnetic resonance images at 3 T compared with micro-computed tomographic measurements

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 392-398

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.020

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; micro-CT; osteoporosis; trabecular thickness; wavelets

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR049701] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM025101] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG017762] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR49701] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG17762] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM25101-26] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trabecular bone structure and bone density contribute to the strength of bone and are important in the study of osteoporosis. Wavelets are a powerful tool in characterizing and quantifying texture in an image. The purpose of this study was to validate wavelets as a tool in computing trabecular bone thickness directly from gray-level images. To this end, eight cylindrical cores of vertebral trabecular bone were imaged using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and micro-computed tomography (mu CT). Thickness measurements of the trabecular bone from the wavelet-based analysis were compared with standard 2D structural parameters analogous to bone histomorphometry (MR images) and direct 3D distance transformation methods (mu CT images). Additionally, bone volume fraction was determined using each method. The average difference in trabecular thickness between the wavelet and standard methods was less than the size of 1 pixel size for both MRI and mu CT analysis. A correlation (R) of .94 for mu CT measurements and that of .52 for MRI were found for the bone volume fraction. Based on these results, we conclude that wavelet-based methods deliver results comparable with those from established MR histomorphometric measurements. Because the wavelet transform is more robust with respect to image noise and operates directly on gray-level images, it could be a powerful tool for computing structural bone parameters from MR images acquired using high resolution and thus limited signal scenarios. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available