4.4 Article

Optimized expression vector for ion channel studies in Xenopus oocytes and mammalian cells using alfalfa mosaic virus

Journal

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 454, Issue 1, Pages 155-163

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-006-0183-1

Keywords

plasmid; alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV); episomal replication; tsA201/HEK293T cells; beta-globin

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH066406] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R56NS034727, R01NS034727] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 66406, R01 MH066406-05, R01 MH066406] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R56 NS034727, R01 NS034727-12, NS 34727, R01 NS034727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasmid vectors used for mammalian expression or for in vitro cRNA translation can differ substantially and are rarely cross-compatible. To make comparisons between mammalian and Xenopus oocyte expression systems, it would be advantageous to use a single vector without the need for shuttle vectors or subcloning. We have designed such a vector, designated pUNIV for universal, with elements that will allow for in vitro or ex vivo expression in multiple cell types. We tested the expression of pUNIV-based cDNA cassettes using enhanced green fluorescent protein and two forms of the type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABA(A)R) and compared pUNIV to vectors optimized for expression in either Xenopus oocytes or mammalian cells. In HEK293 cells, radioligand binding was robust, and patch clamp experiments showed that subtle macroscopic GABA(A)R kinetics were indistinguishable from our previous results. In Xenopus oocytes, agonist median effective concentration measurements matched previous work using a vector optimized for oocyte expression. Furthermore, we found that expression using pUNIV was significantly enhanced in oocytes and was remarkably long-lasting in both systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available