4.5 Article

Comparison of successful and unsuccessful islet/sertoli cell cotransplant grafts in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1029-1038

Publisher

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/000000007783472417

Keywords

sertoli cell; islet; transplantation; diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sertoli cells (SC) protect islet allografts from immune destruction in diabetic rodents. In this study, we examined the difference between successful and rejected islet/SC cografts in order to further improve this procedure for optimal extension of islet allograft survival. We cotransplanted 500 BALB/c islets with 1-8 million BALB/c SC under the kidney capsule of diabetic BALB/c, C3H-HeJ, and C57BL/6 mice. Cotransplantation of islets with up to 8 million SC was not detrimental to long-term islet graft function in syngeneic mice. However, large numbers of SC were detrimental to islet graft survival in allogeneic mice with the optimal dose for cotransplantation of 4 or I million SC in C3H-HeJ or C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Examination of successful grafts, from euglycemic recipients, revealed the presence of SC arranged in tubule structures with islets surrounding these tubules. Cellular infiltrate in successful grafts revealed CD4 T cells and macrophages along the periphery and within the grafts, and very few CD8 T cells. Conversely, examination of unsuccessful grafts, harvested from hyperglycemic recipients at the time of rejection, revealed the presence of SC arranged randomly with islets adjacent to the Sertoli cells, when present, and massive CD4 and CD8 T cell as well as macrophage cell infiltration. Prolongation of islet allograft survival appeared to be a function of SC transplant mass and recipient genetic background. A consequence of long-term graft acceptance is the formation of SC tubule structures, which may be an additional requirement for optimal protection of islet allografts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available