4.3 Article

Integration of sensory evidence in motion discrimination

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/7.12.7

Keywords

discrimination; population coding; motion perception; subthreshold summation

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY002017, R01 EY004440, R01 EY02017, R01 EY004440-25, R01 EY002017-24] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To make perceptual judgments, the brain must decode the responses of sensory cortical neurons. The direction of visual motion is represented by the activity of direction-selective neurons. Because these neurons are often broadly tuned and their responses are inherently variable, the brain must appropriately integrate their responses to infer the direction of motion reliably. The optimal integration strategy is task dependent. For coarse direction discriminations, neurons tuned to the directions of interest provide the most reliable information, but for. ne discriminations, neurons with preferred directions displaced away from the target directions are more informative. We measured coarse and. ne direction discriminations with random-dot stimuli. Unbeknownst to the observers, we added subthreshold motion signals of different directions to perturb the responses of different groups of direction-selective neurons. The pattern of biases induced by subthreshold signals of different directions indicates that subjects' choice behavior relied on the activity of neurons with a wide range of preferred directions. For coarse discriminations, observers' judgments were most strongly determined by neurons tuned to the target directions, but for. ne discriminations, neurons with displaced preferred directions had the largest influence. We conclude that perceptual decisions rely on a population decoding strategy that takes the statistical reliability of sensory responses into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available