4.4 Article

H-1 Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dementia

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages S146-S152

Publisher

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/60346217

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [K12HD049078] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024150] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG011378] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024150] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG11378] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD49078] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Present data support the concept that H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1 MRS) may become an adjunct to clinical evaluation for differential diagnosis of dementia in the future. The value of H-1 MRS in monitoring the disease progression in dementia is expected to be in areas where group effects are sought such as monitoring effectiveness of therapies in drug trials. Elevation of myoinositol to creatine (ml/Cr) and choline to creatine (Cho/Cr) and reduction in the neuronal integrity marker N-acetylaspartate to creatine (NAA/Cr) levels in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease suggests that H-1 MRS may also be valuable in predicting future development of dementia and monitoring early disease progression for preventive therapies. Investigations of in vivo H-1 MRS as a marker for differential diagnosis and progression of dementia, however, has been limited to clinically confirmed cohorts and remains to be validated by histopathology at autopsy. Overall, MRS is a promising investigational technique in ageing and dementia at this time. The potential clinical application of MRS in ageing and dementia, however, is growing with technical advances in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available