4.0 Article

Respiratory tract lesions in noninhalation studies

Journal

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 170-177

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01926230601059969

Keywords

toxicology; pathology; respiratory tract; rats; mice; lung; nasal epithelium

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 ES999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews respiratory tract lesions observed in rodents administered various chemicals by noninhalation routes. Chemicals administered by inhalation caused lesions in the respiratory tract and were well described; however, when chemicals were administered by noninhalation routes the effort to evaluate tissues for lesions may have been less or not considered, especially in the upper respiratory tract, and some lesions may have gone undetected. Lesions described in this review mostly occurred in rodent chronic noninhalation studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program; however, some were noted in studies of shorter duration. The nasal cavity was vulnerable to damage when chemicals were administered by noninhalation routes. Changes included respiratory epithelial hyperplasia, degeneration and necrosis of olfactory epithelium, olfactory epithelial metaplasia, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and neuroblastoma. In the lung, compound-related lesions included alveolar histiocytosis, alveolar epithelial hyperplasia, bronchiolar metaplasia of the alveolar epithelium, squamous metaplasia, alveolar/bronchial adenoma and carcinoma, and squamous tumors. Pathogenesis of these lesions included regurgitation of volatiles, metabolites arriving from the blood stream, and additional metabolism by olfactory epithelium or Clara cells. The presence of respiratory tract lesions in noninhalation studies emphasizes the need for a thorough examination of the respiratory tract including nasal passages, regardless of the route of administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available