4.1 Article

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine in llamas

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 25-34

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.68.1.25

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine in llamas. Animals-6 healthy adult llamas. Procedures-Llamas received morphine sulfate in a randomized crossover design. In phase 1, they received IV or IM administration of morphine at 0.05 or 0.5 mg/kg, respectively; in phase 2, they received IV administration of morphine at 0.05, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg. Plasma morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide concentrations were determined by validated methods. Body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, sedation, and analgesia were assessed and compared with plasma concentrations by regression analysis. Results-Total body clearance was similar between IV administration of morphine sulfate at 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg (mean +/- SD, 25.3 +/- 6.9 mL/min/kg and 273 +/- 5.9 mL/min/kg, respectively), and linearity was demonstrated between these doses. Bioavailability of morphine following IM administration at 0.5 mg/kg was 120 +/- 30%. Body temperature and sedation increased as the dose of morphine administered increased. Heart rate was unaffected by varying doses. Respiratory rate decreased as dose increased. Analgesia was difficult to assess as a result of high individual variability. Intravenous administration of morphine at 0.25 mg/kg provided the most consistent increase in tolerance to electric stimulation. Pharmacodynamic modeling revealed a sigmoidal relationship between plasma concentration and sedation score. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Morphine was characterized by a large apparent volume of distribution and high systemic clearance in llamas. A prolonged half-life was observed with IM injection. Intravenous administration of morphine sulfate at 0.25 mg/kg every 4 hours is suggested for further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available