Journal
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 658-665Publisher
AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0430
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH [RO1 CA 39416, P30 ES 03819, T32 OD 01189]
- Pennsylvania Department of Health Commonwealth Universal Research Grant
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In experimental animals and humans, aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) is a potent hepatic toxin and carcinogen. The synthetic oleanane triterpenoid 1-[2-cyano-3-, 12-dioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-oyl]imidazole (CDDO-Im), a powerful activator of Keap1-Nrf2 signaling, protects against AFB(1)-induced toxicity and preneoplastic lesion formation (GST-P-positive foci). This study assessed and mechanistically characterized the chemoprotective efficacy of CDDO-Im against AFB(1)-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A lifetime cancer bioassay was undertaken in F344 rats dosed with AFB(1) (200 mu g/kg rat/day) for four weeks and receiving either vehicle or CDDO-Im (three times weekly), one week before and throughout the exposure period. Weekly, 24-hour urine samples were collected for analysis of AFB(1) metabolites. In a subset of rats, livers were analyzed for GST-P foci. The comparative response of a toxicogenomic RNA expression signature for AFB(1) was examined. CDDO-Im completely protected (0/20) against AFB(1)-induced liver cancer compared with a 96% incidence (22/23) observed in the AFB(1) group. With CDDO-Im treatment, integrated level of urinary AFB(1)-N-7-guanine was significantly reduced (66%) and aflatoxin-N-acetylcysteine, a detoxication product, was consistently elevated (300%) after the first AFB(1) dose. In AFB(1)-treated rats, the hepatic burden of GST-P-positive foci increased substantially (0%-13.8%) over the four weeks, but was largely absent with CDDO-Im intervention. The toxicogenomic RNA expression signature characteristic of AFB(1) was absent in the AFB(1) + CDDO-Im-treated rats. The remarkable efficacy of CDDO-Im as an anticarcinogen is established even in the face of a significant aflatoxin adduct burden. Consequently, the absence of cancer requires a concept of a threshold for DNA damage for cancer development. (C) 2014 AACR.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available