4.4 Article

Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1498-1507

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R01RR016594, P41RR014075] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P50MH071616] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG021910, P50AG005681, P01AG003991] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [RR14075, RR 16594] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, R01 AG021910-03, R01 AG021910-04] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [P20 MH071616] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies is a series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets that is publicly available for study and analysis. The initial data set consists of a cross-sectional collection of 416 subjects aged 18 to 96 years. One hundred of the included subjects older than 60 years have been clinically diagnosed with very mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. The subjects are all right-handed and include both men and women. For each subject, three or four individual TI-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained in single imaging sessions are included. Multiple within-session acquisitions provide extremely high contrast-to-noise ratio, making the data amenable to a wide range of analytic approaches including automated computational analysis. Additionally, a reliability data set is included containing 20 subjects without dementia imaged on a subsequent visit within 90 days of their initial session. Automated calculation of whole-brain volume and estimated total intracranial volume are presented to demonstrate use of the data for measuring differences associated with normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available