4.4 Article

Performance, and cost comparison of a fws and a vsf constructed wetland system

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 621-628

Publisher

SELPER LTD, PUBLICATIONS DIV
DOI: 10.1080/09593332808618820

Keywords

free-water surface constructed wetland; vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland; treatment performance; construction cost; operation cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two constructed wetland systems, treating domestic wastewater, are compared in terms of performance and costs. One is a free water surface (FWS) wctland system located in Pompia, Crete, south Greece, and the other one is a vertical subsurface flow (VSF) wetland system located in Gomati, Chalkidiki, north Greece. The FWS system is designed for 1200 p.c. Its construction cost was (sic)305,000, and the capital, operation and maintenance cost was (sic)22.07 p.c.(-1) yr(-1) or (sic)0.50 m(-3) of influent. The VSF system is designed for 1000 p.c. Its construction cost was (sic)410,850, and the capital, operation and maintenance cost was (sic)36.81 p.c.(-1) yr(-1) or (sic)0.56 m(-3) of influent. Both systems achieved high removal rates for BOD5, COD, TSS, TKN, phosphorus, TC, and FC, which makes them ideal for small communities in the Mediterranean region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available