4.3 Article

Relationships between tree component structure, topography and soils of a riverside forest, Rio Botucarai, Southern Brazil

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 187-200

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-006-9174-8

Keywords

canonical correspondence analysis; flooding; phytogeography; riverine forest; vegetation survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationships among floristic, structural and physiognomic variables of the tree component, flooding regime variations and soil fertility were investigated in a riparian forest fragment (ca. 43 ha) in the Rio Botucarai- watershed near the confluence with the Rio Jacui, southern Brazil. All the trees with a dbh >= 15 cm were surveyed in 100 contiguous 10 x 10 m plots and soil chemical and textural variables were obtained from the analyses of 15 topsoil samples (0-20 cm depth) collected at different locations. The sample sites encompass all the topographic variation of the area. We used canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to seek correlations between environmental variables and tree component distribution. The 1,547 surveyed individuals belonged to 30 species and 16 botanical families. The Shannon diversity index (H') and the Pielou equability (J') were 1.995 and 0.586 nats ind.(-1), respectively. Sebastiania commersoniana, Casearia sylvestris, Eugenia uniflora and Eugenia hyemalis presented the highest importance values. Species' densities chiefly correlated with site elevation, flooding regime and soil chemical fertility. The analyses of ecological categories (EC) revealed that most species are heliophylous and typical of early successional stages. Richness and diversity (P < 0.001) variations from different topographic positions reflect that at the local scale, flooding was a limiting factor for the establishment of certain species suggesting that local processes control species richness and diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available