4.3 Article

Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal events with concurrent use of NSAIDs and SSRIs: a case-control study in the general population

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 403-408

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0263-y

Keywords

case-control study; COX-2 selective NSAIDs; NSAIDs; SSRIs; upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To study the risk of serious upper gastrointestinal (GI) events associated with the concurrent use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and different types of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods This was a nationwide, register-based matched case-control study on non-institutionalized residents of Finland during the period 2000-2004. Patient-cases with serious upper GI events (n=9191) were drawn from the Hospital Discharge Register, and individually matched controls (n=41,780) were drawn from the Population Register. Logistic regression was applied in the data analysis, and adjustments were made for various co-morbidities and the use of other drugs associated with the risk of serious upper GI event. Results The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of serious upper GI events for SSRI use compared to non-use of SSRIs or NSAIDs was 1.30 [95% confidence interval (95%CI: 1.13-1.50)], and the AOR for concurrent SSRI and NSAID use compared to the non-use of either drug was 4.19 (95%CI: 3.30-5.31). The AOR of upper GI events for the concurrent use of SSRIs with NSAIDs compared to patients using NSAIDs only was 1.57 (95%CI: 1.24-1.99). The respective AOR for traditional, non-selective NSAIDs was 1.77 (95%CI: 1.31-2.38), for semi-selective NSAIDs (nimesulide, nabumetone, meloxicam, and etodolac) 1.30 (95%CI: 0.76-2.24) and for COX-2 selective NSAIDs 1.33 (95%CI: 0.70-2.50). Conclusions The concurrent use of SSRIs and NSAIDs is associated with a moderate excess relative risk of a serious upper GI event when compared with NSAID use alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available