4.4 Article

Circulating Levels of Vitamin D and Colon and Rectal Cancer: The Physicians' Health Study and a Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

Journal

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 735-743

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0289

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA42182, CA90598, CA58684, CA34944, CA40360, CA137178, CA097193]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL26490, HL34595]
  3. Damon Runyon clinical investigator award
  4. National Cancer Institute of Canada [019894]
  5. Prevent Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It remains unknown whether increased risk with low levels of vitamin D is present for colon and/or rectal cancer. To investigate the association between circulating vitamin D levels and colon and rectal cancer, we examined the associations between plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] and colon and rectal cancer in the Physicians' Health Study and then conducted a meta-analysis of eight prospective studies of circulating levels of 25(OH)D and colon and rectal cancers, including the Physicians' Health Study. Study-specific ORs and 95% CIs were pooled by using a random-effects model. A total of 1,822 colon and 868 rectal cancers were included in the meta-analysis. We observed a significant inverse association for colorectal cancer (OR = 0.66; 95% Cl, 0.54-0.81), comparing top versus bottom quantiles of circulating 25(OH)D levels. The inverse association stronger for rectal cancer (OR = 0.50 for top versus bottom quantiles; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88) than colon cancer (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.07; P value for difference between colon and rectal cancer = 0.20). These data suggest an inverse association between circulating 25(OH)D levels and colorectal cancer, with a stronger association for rectal cancer. Cancer Pier Res; 4(5); 735-43. (c) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available