4.4 Article

Relating otolith chemistry to surface water chemistry in a coastal plain estuary

Journal

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/F07-015

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although laboratory studies confirm that otoliths incorporate trace elements and stable isotopes from surrounding waters, few studies explore the relationship of otolith chemistry to water chemistry in the field and none include a larger suite of environmental tracers, such as rare earth elements. Using spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) as model species, we tested the hypothesis that otoliths record the water chemistry of seagrass habitats in Chesapeake Bay. In summer 2001, we sampled water and juvenile fish in seagrass beds of the bay. Weighted linear regressions showed that [Ba/Ca](otolith) and [La/Ca](otolith) were best predicted by salinity and were modeled as [Ba/Ca](otolith) (mu mol center dot mol(-1)) = -2.25 +/- 0.35 x salinity + 59.47 +/- 7.01) and [La/Ca](otolith) (pmol center dot mol(-1)) = -8.71 +/- 0.65 x salinity + 243.87 +/- 12.52. [Ba/Ca](otolith) increased with [Ba/Ca](water), but the relationship was nonlinear. Salinity did not influence [Mn/Ca](otolith), but this ratio was positively correlated with [Mn/Ca](water). Although the partition coefficient of Sr (D-Sr = 0.23 +/- 0.019) was similar to that in laboratory experiments, [Sr/Ca] in waters and otoliths was decoupled despite equal temperature exposure, suggesting that [Sr/Ca](otolith) concentration may not be a simple function of water composition. However, there was a predictive relationship between [delta O-18](otolith) and [Sr/Ca](water) ([delta O-18](otolith) = 1.18 +/- 0.09 x [Sr/Ca](water) (mmol center dot mol(-1)) - 14.286 +/- 0.78) resulting from mixing between fluvial and oceanic waters. Water chemistry showed mixed values as a proxy for otolith chemistry and may not be a surrogate for otolith chemistry in wide estuaries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available