4.5 Article

The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the osteogenic potential of rat mesenchymal stem cells after several passages

Journal

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 285-292

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17453670710013816

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Since the osteogenic potential of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stems cells (BMSCs) become reduced with passage, establishment of culture condition that permit the rapid expansion of BMSCs while retaining their potential for differentiation is needed for clinical applications. Bone morphogenetic proteins stimulate osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal progenitor cells as well as increase stem cell numbers. Thus, we analysed the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) on the osteogenic potential of rat BMSCs over several passages. Materials and methods Osteogenic differentiation in vitro was evaluated in terms of the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the osteocalcin (OC) concentration in the supernatants, and the expression of ALP and OC mRNA in the cultured cells. For in-vivo osteogenesis, BMScs cultured with and without rhBMP-2 through all passages were implanted into athymic mice. Results The level of osteogenic markers were significantly higher in the cells of the BMP(+) group than in the cells of the BMP(-) group, although they decreased with passage irrespective of whether or not rhBMP-2 was added. Similar to the in-vitro experiments, there was a greater degree of bone and cartilage tissue formation in the BMP(+) group over all passages. Interpretation From our results, osteogenic potential can be maintained even in BMSCs that have been passaged several times in the presence of rhBMP-2. These cells are capable of inducing and participating in bone formation and can be used for clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available