4.3 Article

Histologic assessment of right atrial appendage myocardium in patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Journal

CARDIOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 90-96

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000095936

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; atrial fibrosis

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [1K24 AG00948-05] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K24AG000948] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atrial fibrillation ( AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass graft ( CABG) surgery. Despite the prevalence of AF occurring after cardiac surgery, its pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Our previous study demonstrated that age and left atrial enlargement were independent predictors of postoperative AF. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine whether cellular changes such as fibrosis and/ or hypertrophy occurred in the atrium in patients who subsequently developed postoperative AF. Right atrial appendage tissue was obtained during atriotomy in patients undergoing elective CABG surgery. Quantitative assessment of atrial fibrosis was performed with Sirius red stain, and atrial cell diameter was measured with the HE stain. Linear regression, t test, chi(2) 2 test or Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. Sixty-one patients ( mean age 71 +/- 8 years) were studied. Increasing age was significantly associated with fibrosis ( beta 0.3, 95% Cl: 0.06 - 0.55, p = 0.017). The amount of right atrial fibrosis tended to correlate with the incidence of postoperative AF ( p = 0.08). Cell diameter was not significantly different between patients with versus without postoperative AF ( p = 0.85). These results suggest that the age-related atrial fibrosis rather than cellular hypertrophy may be important in the pathogenesis of AF after CABG surgery and should be further investigated. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available