4.7 Article

Bread from composite cassava-wheat flour: I. Effect of baking time and temperature on some physical properties of bread loaf

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 280-290

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.10.012

Keywords

bread loaf properties; composite flour; cassava; wheat; response surface methodology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of composite cassava-wheat (CCW) flour for commercial breadmaking purposes and consumption of CCW bread are relatively new in Nigeria. This study investigated the effect of baking temperature and time on some physical properties of bread from composite flour made by mixing cassava and wheat flour at ratio of 10:90 (w/w). A central composite rotatable experimental design was used while the baking temperature and time investigated ranged from 190 to 240 degrees C and 20 to 40 min, respectively. Loaf volume, weight and specific volume varied significantly (p < 0.001) from 440 to 920 cm(3), 162 to 183 g and 3.31 to 5.32 cm(3)/g, respectively. The tristimulus color parameters such as L* (lightness) and brownness index (BI) of the crust varied significantly (p < 0.01) from 31 to 72 and 68 to 123, respectively. Moreover, Fresh crumb moisture, density, porosity and softness as well as the dried crumb hardness were also significantly (p < 0.01) affected by both the baking temperature and time with values ranging from 34% to 39%, 0.16 to 0.20 g/cm(3), 0.69 to 0.80, 13.00 to 18.05 min and 0.90 to 2.05 kgf, respectively. Due to the complex effect of temperature and time combination, most of the measured properties could not be reliably predicted from the second order response surface regression equations except the loaf weight and crumb moisture. Further studies are required to optimize the CCW bread baking process based on some storage and consumption qualities. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available