Journal
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 291-309Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601000581
Keywords
-
Funding
- Economic and Social Research Council [RES-538-28-1001] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A major topic within human learning, the field of contingency judgement, began to emerge about 25 years ago following publication of an article on depressive realism by Alloy and Abramson (1979). Subsequently, associationism has been the dominant theoretical framework for understanding contingency learning but this has been challenged in recent years by an alternative cognitive or inferential approach. This article outlines the key conceptual differences between these approaches and summarizes some of the main methods that have been employed to distinguish between them.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available