4.7 Article

Generation of erythroid cells from fibroblasts and cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 333, Issue 2, Pages 205-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.01.037

Keywords

Solid tumor cells; Erythroid cells; Hypoxia; Cobalt chloride; c-Myc

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health and Cancer Prevention [R01CA131183-01A2, IP50CA83638]
  2. Research Institute of Texas Multi-Investigator Grant
  3. National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone marrow is generally considered the main source of erythroid cells. Here we report that a single hypoxia-mimic chemical, CoCl2, can increase the size of fibroblasts and cancer cells and lead to formation of polyploidy giant cells (PGCs) or polyploidy giant cancer cells (PGCCs), activation of stem cell marker expression, increased growth of normal and cancer spheroid, and lead to differentiation of the fibroblasts and epithelial cells toward erythroid lineage expressing hemoglobins both in vitro and in vivo. Immunohistochemical examination demonstrated that these cells are predominantly made of embryonic hemoglobins, with various levels of fetal and adult hemoglobins. Ectopic expression of c-Myc induced the generation of nucleated erythoid cells expressing variable levels of embryonic and fetal hemoglobins. Generation of these erythroid cells can be also observed via histological examination of other cancer cell lines and human tumor samples. These data suggest that normal and solid cancer cells can directly generate erythroid cells to obtain oxygen in response to hypoxia and may explain the ineffectiveness of conventional anti-angiogenic therapies for cancer, which are directed at endothelium-dependent vessels, and offer new targets for intervention. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available