4.7 Review

Lipocalin 2 in cancer: When good immunity goes bad

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 316, Issue 2, Pages 132-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.11.002

Keywords

Iron; Tumorigenesis; ER stress; Oncogene

Categories

Funding

  1. UCSD Academic Senate
  2. Frank H. and Eva B. Buck Foundation
  3. UCSD IMSD
  4. NIH [GM083275]
  5. UCSD
  6. NIDA [DA007315-07A2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The innate immune molecule Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) was initially shown to combat bacterial infection by binding bacterial siderophores, hence impairing microbial iron sequestration. In recent years, it has become apparent that LCN2 is over-expressed in cancers of diverse histological origin and that it facilitates tumorigenesis by promoting survival, growth, and metastasis. Herein, we discuss emerging evidence that substantiates two functional roles for LCN2 in cancer: promotion of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) that facilitates an invasive phenotype and metastasis, and sequestration of iron that results in cell survival and tumorigenesis. Further, we present evidence that upregulated LCN2 expression in solid tumors is induced by hypoxia and pro-inflammation, microenvironmental noxae that converge to cause an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Taken together, it appears that tumor cells exploit the beneficial innate immune function of LCN2 to support uncontrolled growth. This duplicity in function highlights LCN2 and its upstream driver, the ER stress response, as key targets for cancer therapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available