4.7 Article

The TSP motif in AP180 inhibits phospholipase D1 activity resulting in increased efficacy of anticancer drug via its direct binding to carboxyl terminal of phospholipase D1

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 302, Issue 2, Pages 144-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.01.005

Keywords

Phospholipase D1; Assembly protein 180; Site-directed mutagenesis; Peptidomimetic drug; Cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A084985]
  2. Korean Government (MEST) [2009-0091462]
  3. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A084985] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phospholipase D (PLD) has two isoforms, PLD1 and PLD2. Both isoforms are possible candidates for the development of anticancer drugs, since PLDs in several cancer cells act as survival factors. The aim of this study was to elucidate the inhibitory mechanism of PLD1 by AP180 in human cancer cells. Transfection of the human AP180 (hAP180) gene markedly inhibited phobol-12-myristate 13-acetate-induced PLD activity resulting in exacerbation of anticancer drug-induced cell death. Experiments using deletion mutants of hAP180 showed that three amino acids (Thr312-Pro314) are critical for inhibition of PLD1 activity by binding directly to PLD1, and, of these. Ser313 was the most important residue for both binding to and inhibiting PLD1. However, this inhibitory relationship did not exist between hAP180 and PLD2. In addition, the C-terminal region of PLD1 is important for the interaction with hAP180. These results indicated that Thr312-Pro314 (especially Ser313 as a phosphorylation residue) of hAP180 can regulate hPLD1 activity through binding with the C-terminal region of PLD1. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available