4.7 Article

Tumoricidal bystander effect in the suicide gene therapy using mesenchymal stem cells does not injure normal brain tissues

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 306, Issue 1, Pages 99-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.02.037

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cell; Glioma; Suicide gene therapy; Bystander effect; Herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20791005, 18090394]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20791005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our previous rat study, an established intracranial C6 glioma was successfully treated using intratumoral injection of mesenchymal stem cells transduced with the herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene (MSCtk) and systemic administration of ganciclovir (GCV). In the present study, effect of the bystander effect associated with the MSCtk/GCV strategy on the background normal brain tissues was examined in both in vitro and in vivo conditions. Rat MSCtk and C6 glioma cells were mixed and seeded on the rat primary neuron and glia co-culture in the medium containing GCV to generate the bystander effect and the numbers of background cells were counted on day 0, 2 and 7. Though the number of MSCtk and C6 cells decreased rapidly due to the bystander effect, most of the neurons and glias survived on day 7. Next, rats were intracranially injected with the MSCtk and C6 cells and then intraperitoneally administered with GCV for 7 days. No remarkable histological abnormality including apoptosis was observed in the background brain tissues near the injection site. The present study has demonstrated that the tumoricidal bystander effect does not injure the background normal brain tissue significantly and that the suicide gene therapies are sufficiently safe. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available