4.6 Review

Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly

Journal

TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 407-414

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.08.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK53434] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM72048] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK053434] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM072048] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic protein interactions play a significant part in many cellular processes. A technique that shows considerable promise in elucidating such interactions is Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). When combined with multiple, colored fluorescent proteins, FRET permits high spatial resolution assays of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Because FRET signals are usually small, however, their measurement requires careful interpretation and several control experiments. Nevertheless, the use of FRET in cell biological experiments has exploded over the past few years. Here we describe the physical basis of FRET and the fluorescent proteins appropriate for these experiments. We also review the approaches that can be used to measure FRET, with particular emphasis on the potential artifacts associated with each approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available