4.7 Article

Androgen manipulation alters oxidative DNA adduct levels in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells grown in vitro and in vivo

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 261, Issue 1, Pages 74-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.11.015

Keywords

carcinogenesis; testosterone; flutamide; DNA damage

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0100874] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0100874] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [G0100874] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) may cause oxidative DNA damage, resulting in the formation of adducts such as 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) and the cyclic pyrimidopurinone N-1, N-2 malondialdehyde-2'-deoxyguanosine (M(1)dG). These adducts have been associated with carcinogenesis, genomic instability and clonal evolution. We tested two hypotheses in human prostate cancer cells grown in vitro and in a xenograft model: (1) treatment of androgen-sensitive cells with DHT increases levels of oxidative DNA adduct levels; (2) flutamide, a competitive androgen receptor antagonist, prevents DHT-induced changes. Levels of M(1)dG and 8-oxo-dG adducts were determined by immunoslot blot and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. M(1)dG and 8-oxo-dG levels were significantly higher than control levels in LNCaP cells exposed to supra-physiological concentrations (25-100 nM) of DHT (both P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Flutamide pre-treatment completely prevented this increase. In the xenograft model, tumour levels of M(1)dG were decreased by 46% (P = 0.001 by Mann-Whitney Test) in flutamide-treated animals compared to controls. The changes demonstrated suggest that oxidative DNA adducts may serve as biomarkers of the efficacy of androgen manipulation in chemoprevention trials. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available