4.2 Review

Combinations of Bevacizumab With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal

CANCER JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 171-179

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000323

Keywords

Angiogenesis; bevacizumab; immune checkpoint inhibitors; kidney cancer; PD-1/PD-L1; atezolizumab; Renal cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer CenterKidney Cancer SPORE [P50 CA101942]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA101942] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by aberrant angiogenic signaling and an immunogenic tumor microenvironment. Systemic therapies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and the immune checkpoints programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein 1 ligand and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 have advanced to the forefront of the treatment repertoire against advanced or metastatic RCC (mRCC). In preclinical models, inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling promotes antitumor immunity and may enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Bevacizumab, which has previously shown antitumor activity in mRCC as monotherapy and in combination with interferon a, is now under investigation in clinical trials in combinations involving multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors. The combination of bevacizumab plus atezolizumab has demonstrated efficacy in a randomized phase III study of treatment-naive mRCC patients whose tumors express programmed cell death protein 1 ligand. We review here the preclinical rationale for combining antiangiogenic therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and highlight the status of current clinical development of combinations involving bevacizumab and immune checkpoint inhibitors in RCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available