4.2 Article

Trust determinants and outcomes in global B2B services

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING
Volume 41, Issue 9-10, Pages 1096-1116

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/03090560710773363

Keywords

relationship marketing; trust; culture; business-to-business marketing; services

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to specify and test factors surrounding trusting relationships between buyers and suppliers in a global, business-to-business services context. In so doing, the paper aims to help to extend relationship marketing theories to this under-researched domain. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review and results of qualitative interviews in the paper provide a conceptual framework for the trust formation process and relational outcomes of trust. The research then tests a model of hypothesized relationships using structural equation modeling. Findings - The paper confirms the influence of trust building behaviors (social interaction, open communications, customer orientation) and service outcomes (technical, functional and economic quality) on trust formation. Trust is shown to have a positive influence on key relational outcomes, loyalty commitment and share of purchases. Research limitations/implications - The sample consists of buyers of aviation component repair services who may be susceptible to idiosyncratic industry pressures. Further, the sample of buyers in 42 countries includes a higher share of buyers from individualist countries. Practical implications - The study provides managerially relevant (actionable) results that may help buyers execute customer retention strategies that lead to higher customer profitability. Originality/value - This study adds to the limited literature on building trust in 13213 services in a global context. The paper seeks to provide a balanced account of the interpersonal and tangible aspects of trust formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available