4.2 Article

Hypofractionation for Prostate Cancer

Journal

CANCER JOURNAL
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181976614

Keywords

prostate cancer; hypofractionation; stereotactic body radiotherapy; fractionation

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA106835, R01 CA106835, P01 CA088960, CA88960, P01 CA088960-05, R01 CA106835-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA088960, R01CA106835] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypofractionation for prostate cancer was originally carried out ill the pursuit of efficiency and convenience but has now attracted greatly renewed interest based upon a hypothesis that prostate cancers have a higher sensitivity to fraction size, reflected in a low alpha/beta ratio, than do late responding organs at risk such as the rectum or bladder. Tumor control and acceptable toxicity outcomes from several hypofractionation or brachytherapy analyses do in fact support all alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer that is low, perhaps even lower that that for the normal organs that ordinarily constrain the delivery of radiation therapy. However, many of these studies lack sufficient patient numbers and follow-up, are clouded by dose inhomogeneity issues in the case of brachytherapy, or delivered effective doses that were too low by contemporary standards. Thus, the clinical efficacy of the approach has yet to be fully validated. However, a number of newer prospective trials, some randomized, are underway or have reached accrual but await sufficient follow-up for analysis, These studies, which cover a wide range of doses per fraction, should ultimately be capable of validating the utility of prostate hypofractionation and the models that predict its effects. With hypofractionation's significant potential for therapeutic gain, cost savings, and improved patient convenience, the future management of localized prostate cancer could be profoundly altered in the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available